Feudalism / Manorialism 101

Following the fall of the Western Roman Empire (476 AD), Western Europe became a land ruled by local kings. As the kingdoms grew and shrank, fought amongst each other, and endured invasions from the Vikings and other warrior peoples, kings began to need a rigid structure to hold their kingdoms together. Over time, the social structure evolved into what many call feudalism.

At its core, feudalism was simply a system of rights and responsibilities between land owners and those who looked after it. The goal of feudalism was to protect the land from invasion and to provide the landowners with a stream of income (harvested crops). During the Middle Ages, the real measure of wealth was land ownership. Feudalism was a system designed to protect that wealth.

Land owners generally had too much land to take care of by themselves. Under feudalism, the king or noble that owned the land divided it into smaller, more manageable chunks called fiefs. The fiefs were then given to nobles of lower rank called vassals. As payment for the land, the vassal pledged his loyalty to the king or noble above him. If the king should ask, the vassal also had to pay taxes to him and provide armies in the event of war.

Sometimes, the fief was still to large to be maintained by one vassal. In that case, the vassal would divide his land into smaller fiefs and distribute it to other nobles. These sub-vassals then had to pledge their loyalty, taxes, and armies to the noble that granted the fief and also to the king.

Manorialism is a term often used interchangeably with feudalism. Manorialism is basically the social system used to regulate the relationship between the vassals and the peasants or serfs that worked on their fiefs.

Peasants were lower class people that agreed to work the vassals' land in exchange for a small part of the crops and other harvested resources. Serfs were one step below peasants. Serfs were essentially slaves to the land. If the land changed hands, the serfs went with it to the new owner.

In some ways, the systems of feudalism and manorialism are kind of like the structure of modern businesses. Today, a large company generally has a president. The president has vice presidents in charge of smaller departments, and the vice presidents have managers heading up various parts of those departments.

In other ways, feudalism and manorialism are like modern pyramid schemes. In a pyramid scheme, those at the top, the kings, simply sit around and collect the income generated by those at the bottom of the pyramid. The further down the pyramid you are, the harder you work. Those at the bottom also almost always make the least money.

The beginning of the end for feudalism in Europe came with the Black Plague. After the Plague claimed about 1/3 of the populated of Europe, nobles were in dire need of peasants to work their land. To meet this demand, peasants demanded better pay, more rights, and better living conditions.

While many people generally associate feudalism/manorialism with Medieval Europe, it existed in other parts of the world as well such as Japan, India, and other areas. In some parts of the world, feudalism is still in existence.

Examples of feudalism

The Louisiana Purchase

How does 3-cents per acre sound? That's how much Thomas Jefferson and the United States paid France for the Louisiana territory in 1803. The total price for effectively doubling the territory of the U.S. was $15,000,000.

According to Economic History Resources, the price in modern dollars would be 49-cents per acre or $242.8-million for all 828,000 square miles of land. The Louisiana Purchase was a great deal by any measure.

Please pass the Louisiana

In 1682, French explorer La Salle claimed the Louisiana Territory for France. While at war with Britain in the Americas in 1762 (The French and Indian War), France gave the territory to Spain. The Spanish Empire, on the verge of bankruptcy and having already over extended herself, gave the territory back to France in 1802.

Certainly Spain and France must have seen the potential of the Louisiana Territory, so why didn't they do anything with it? Probably it was a matter of logistics and priorities. Spain was beginning to feel the rising tide of the coming revolution in Mexico and was having problems hanging on to her other New World colonies. France was in the same boat. Just prior to the Louisiana Purchase, France had been unable to quell a slave rebellion in Haiti. Spain and France had other, more pressing matters to attend to, and neither nation had a presence strong enough in the region to fully explore and exploit the resources of the Louisiana Territory. Finally, both nations were not in particularly good shape economically. That meant that Napolean was going to price the territory to move quick. As the saying goes, one man's trash in another man's treasure.



Why would France give up such a large amount of land for so little? It is hard to get inside the mind of Napolean to figure that out, but the move was probably the result of a combination of things. First, France was about to go to war with Great Britain, the greatest naval power in the world at the time. The likely naval blockade of French ports and trade would mean further economic woes for Napolean's regime. Second, France no longer had a presence in North America sizeable enough to fully explore the territory and exploit the available resources. In short, one man's trash is another man's treasure.

Implications of the Louisiana Purchase

The Louisiana Purchase was HUGE for the United States, literally and figuratively. The acquisition doubled the territory of the U.S. and gave the young nation room to grow. And grow she did. The first order of business for President Thomas Jefferson after the purchase was to explore it. In 1804, he sent Lewis and Clarke on an expedition to explore the new territory. Shortly thereafter, a flood of settlers began going west to make their fortune.

The Louisiana Purchase also helped start three wars. Spain/Mexico disputed parts of the territory involved in the deal between France and the United States. This eventually led to a showdown between Texas and Mexico. Continued disputes over the territory and the idea of Manifest Destiny (the belief that the U.S. was ordained by God to control the land from sea to sea) also led to war between the United States and Mexico in 1846-1848. The continued addition of states in the west also upset the delicate balance between slave and free states. This eventually led to the terribly bloody American Civil War. Futhermore, the Louisiana Purchase was disastrous for Native Americans. Tribe after tribe was forced to give up their land or face annihilation.

What if the Louisiana Purchase never happened?

It is hard to imagine that the United States would not have eventually expanded from coast to coast anyway, but westward expansion would likely have been much slower. The idea does bring up some interesting scenarios though. What if Spain had somehow regained her strength and been able to fully develop California and the Southwest? Without the added cushion of territory and resources, could the loss of the Louisiana Purchase have changed the outcome of the War of 1812 with Great Britain? What if other nations-Russia, Japan, or China-had established a firm foothold in the Northwest? All of these are questions are great food for thought.

The fact remains, however, that the Louisiana Purchase did take place. It was sort of a vitamin shot for the fledgling nation of upstarts, and it played a huge role in shaping the nation's history.

The Eagle of the Ninth by Rosemary Sutcliff

After the last boy came one last priest, not a totem priest, as the others had been. His head-dress was made of the burnished feathers of a golden eagle, and a long roar burst from the crowd as the curtain dropped clashing into a place behind him. But to Marcus everything seemed for the moment to have grown very still. For the last comer was carrying something that had once been a Roman Eagle. (p. 189)



As Sutcliff describes in her introduction to this historical novel for young adults, THE EAGLE OF THE NINTH is based on an actual event.

In 117 AD a Roman legion forayed into the wilds of Northern Britain to deal with the barbarian tribes. The legion was never seen again. Sutcliff combines this event with a wingless Roman Eagle that was found during an excavation in Great Britain. The result is a fictional, but believable, story about a Roman officer heading into the barbarian lands to try to recover the lost eagle of the Ninth Legion to reclaim his father's (the lost legion's commander) good name. The real excitement of THE EAGLE OF THE NINTH arrives as Marcus Aquila, the protagonist, and his freed slave Esca try to evade the barbarians on their return south.

In the process of telling the story, Sutcliff deals with several aspects of the Roman Empire that are quite accurate and relevant to a study of this interesting period of history. THE EAGLE OF THE NINTH gives a portrait of the Roman social class system, partucularly the intricacies of living on the frontiers of the Empire. The novel deals with slavery in the empire, and we get a glimpse of the brutality and manic furvor associated with gladitorial games. Sutcliffe also delves into the complexities of the Roman bureaucracy, particularly the often strained relationship between the military and the politicians.

Perhaps my favorite aspect of THE EAGLE OF THE NINTH is how Sutcliff delivers three distinct perceptions of the Roman Empire. First, the reader gets the perception of Marcus Aquila, a native Roman from a military family. Second, the view of Esca, a gladiator purchased by Marcus and later freed by his master, provides the reader with the point of view of someone in the process of assimilation into the empire. Finally Sutcliff shows the perspective of the Celts and Britons as they resist domination from Rome. These three perspectives give a balanced look at the social implications of Rome's motives and the means by which they are implemented.

My ratings on a scale of 5:

Historial relevance--5
Entertainment--4

The Paleolithic or Old Stone Age

The Paleolithic or Old Stone Age began between 500,000 and 2 million years ago and lasted until about 10,000 years ago.

Neolithic (New Stone Age) Revolution

The Neolithic or New Stone Age was a time of great development for early humans. During the Neolithic Age, humans went from depending on hunting and gathering to being able to farm their own crops and breed and herd animals for their own use.

What is a civilization?

What is a civilization? One definition is a society or culture that has developed knowledge of farming, trade, government, and art and science.

We’re going to go a little bit farther. In fact, I’m going to give you the five things without which, no civilization can survive.

1. Food Surplus (Having more food than you need to survive)
2. Job Specialization (Having jobs other than those that produce food)
3. A Written Language
4. Cities
5. Government (a leader, laws, etc…)

If any one of these things falls apart, the civilization also falls apart. Now, lets look at each of these in more detail…

If you have a surpulus of food...
• Your population grows. Now you have more people to do work other than gathering food.
• You can stay in one place. Ever seen a city that moves?
• You have domesticated plants and animals (farming and raising animals for food and to help do work)

If you have job specialization
• People in your group will learn to do different things to contribute to the society.
• Your group develops new technologies and begins to study the surroundings (science, philosophy, medicing, astronomy, etc...)
• With these new technologies and a surplus of food, your people can live together in cities.
• Your group will develop a system of writing the language (for keeping records, conducting business, etc...)

If you have a written language...
• You can keep records
• Developing technologies becomes easier (it's nice to keep records of your trials, experiments, etc...)
• You can write laws

If you have laws/government...
• You can keep your cities and civilizations together (hopefully)
• With the central control of a government, your civilization can expand

If any of these elements breakdown, so does the civilization. History proves so far that all civilizations eventually come to an end in one way or another. The fall of a civilzation can almost always be traced to one of these 5 crucial elements of a civilization.

Here is a shorter definition of civilization

Ancient Whale Found In the Sahara

The skeleton of a 40-million-year old Basilosaurus isis whale was discovered in an ancient seabed in the Western Sahara desert by a team comprised of scientists from the University of Michigan.

Partial remains of the Basilosaurus isis were discovered in the same region in years past, but this is the first complete skeleton of the mammal to be excavated.

The original skeleton will be shipped to Michigan for preservation. It will then be returned for exhibition in Egypt. The skeleton is 50 feet long.

The Santa Fe Trail: Its History, Legends, and Lore by David Dary

Book Summary

David Dary’s The Santa Fe Trail: Its History, Legends and Lore begins with the early Spanish exploration of New Mexico and the surrounding territory. All of the most well known expeditions are covered including Coronado, Cabeza de Vaca, Fray Marcos, and others. An emphasis is placed on Juan de Oñate who left Mexico City in 1598 to claim New Mexico for the Spanish crown and establish settlements. Oñate did as planned, and shortly before he was replaced as governor, he established the village of Santa Fe which would soon become the permanent capital of New Mexico and eventually the target of the Santa Fe Trail. The Camino Real, the trail that Oñate followed north from Mexico City, became the first trail of commerce to Santa Fe.

Dary writes in fair detail about this early trade to Santa Fe from Mexico City and Chihuahua and its pitfalls and benefits. Suffice it to say, that while the merchants profited from the trade and the Spanish government from taxes, many New Mexicans were touched in negative ways by the corruption and exploitation that came along with the trade.

Other than some trade that existed with the Indians, trade to Santa Fe was almost completely dominated by the Spanish until the 1800s. There were some attempts to establish permanent trade with Santa Fe, but they were either unsuccessful or came at the wrong point in time to survive very long. One of the attempts described by Dary was by Frenchmen living in the mid-west and southern part of the present-day United States. This area was referred to then as the Louisiana Territory, and at this time, 1739, was still under rule of the French crown. After a series of obstacles placed by the Spanish government were overcome, trade opened between New Mexico and the French in the Louisiana Territory. Traders achieved limited success for about ten years until Spain grew tired of the growing French influence in New Mexico, and in 1752, the trade all but ended.

In 1762, France ceded its territory west of the Mississippi River to Spain. This huge tract of land included all of what was to become the Santa Fe Trail. Frenchmen then founded St. Louis, in the newly acquired Spanish territory in 1764 with no objection or protest from Spain. Trade in the new lands was still, however, dominated by Spanish merchants from Chihuahua. In 1801, France regained control of the Louisiana territory due in part to Spain’s financial hardships and a new revolutionary government in France. Then in 1803, the President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, bought the Louisiana Territory from France, thus ushering in a new era and further clearing way for future American trade to Santa Fe. The realization of potential of America trading with Santa Fe became more apparent as explorers like Zebulon Pike traversed the territory along the new American frontier.

Spain, however, was still not open outside trade with Santa Fe. Nevertheless, in 1821 William Becknell set out with a small trade expedition from a point near Franklin, Missouri. On the way to Santa Fe, Becknell learned that Mexico had achieved independence from Spain. Becknell’s trade expedition was successful, and the new government of Mexico announced essentially that trade with the U.S. was now open. Shortly after Becknell reached Santa Fe, the McKnight-James party arrived from St. Louis. Others followed in 1822, and then more still in subsequent years. Missouri was already a state, and soon the success of the Santa Fe trade, among other things, prompted Missouri Senator Thomason Benton helped get a bill passed in the U.S. government to that commissioned a survey and the marking of a road from Missouri to Santa Fe.

Until the twentieth century, there was never a very accurate marking of the Santa Fe Trail, nor was there a road built. Travelers relied strictly on available maps and landmarks along the way. It is critical to note that at a landmark called Point of Rocks about fifty miles west of present-day Dodge City, Kansas, the Santa Fe Trail branched into two trails which did not meet up again until they reached Mora, New Mexico. The southern or "dry route" was the more direct route and went southwest from Fort Dodge through the Oklahoma Panhandle, northeastern New Mexico, Wagon Mound, Mora, Las Vegas and finally to Santa Fe. It was a shorter trip, but as indicated by the route’s name, there was a profound lack of water on the southern route.

The northern or "mountain route" went west from Fort Dodge into present-day Colorado and then turned southwest near modern-day La Junta, Colorado and Bent’s Fort. Bent’s Fort was an important location along the northern route of the Santa Fe Trail that served as a fortification and a supply point for travelers. After Bent’s Fort, the northern route crossed the western plains of Colorado, over Raton Pass, and on to Mora and Santa Fe. This route was longer and had more rugged terrain, but if taken during the summer, the climate was often more livable and had a more plentiful water supply.

The Santa Fe trade and traffic on the Santa Fe Trail increased dramatically from 1822 until its demise in 1880 after the arrival of the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railroad to Santa Fe. During the Mexican-American War (1848) and on through the Civil War and the conquest of the American Indians, much of the traffic on the trail consisted of private companies or traders hauling military supplies to the Army of the West in Santa Fe and Fort Union, New Mexico. After the arrival of the railroad, the Santa Fe Trail was no longer needed to haul freight. Today, the only physical remains today of the trail is historical markers, wagon ruts, a few ruins, some artifacts, and the volumes of information contained in the many publications and memoirs written about the trail and life on it.

Review

The Santa Fe Trail: Its History, Legends and Lore is by no means a complete history of the Santa Fe Trail. Many volumes would have to be written in order to fully cover a story that spans such a long period of time and such a large geographic area. The book does provide a very thorough overview of the trail, some of the people who traveled it. The book also gives insights into the economic, and to a lesser extent, the social impact the trail and trade had on the United States and the southwest. I am somewhat baffled by the "Legends and Lore" part of the title of this book. Dary does make reference to legends of lost gold along the trail and some trader’s tales that seem to be romanticized and embellished, but overall, I consider this to be a historical book which uses what seem to be believable historical sources. I cannot help but wonder if someone at Penguin Publishing added the legends and lore part of the title to help sell books.

Dary documents his research by using footnote style numbers, all of which are organized by chapter and explained in the back of the book in the "Notes" section. In addition, Dary lists a thirteen-page bibliography, and there is also a handy glossary and index. Among the works listed in the bibliography are books, articles, government documents, pamphlets, and dissertations. I thought Dary used quotes well in the book. Almost all, if not all, were from primary documents, which I thought added great effect and was far better than quoting another researcher. The various maps, tables, and illustrations also added to the overall effect of this book.

The Santa Fe Trail: Its History, Legends and Lore is written in an easy to read style. Dary’s writing flows and I believe that just about anyone would be able to follow the story without a problem. The only difficulty I had was in trying to keep straight all of the towns, forts, and other geographical places he mentions. This was easily remedied, however, by use of the included maps and glossary. My impression is that Dary was aiming to a wide audience that could feasibly include anyone from high school up.

Dary went into much more detail than I expected about the background information concerning New Mexico and Missouri. He did a good job in building up to the actual use of the Santa Fe Trail and showing the previous successes and failures in trade with Santa Fe. While at first, I thought the background information was overkill, looking back, I think it was very useful in laying the foundation for what was to come in later chapters.

The book gives a very good explanation of the mechanics of trade along the Santa Fe Trail. From the different wagons and pulling systems used to the various ways traders obtained water and defended their wagon trains from Indian attacks, Dary covers it all. I also thought he did a good job of showing the relationship and reaction of the Santa Fe Trail and trade to events such as the Mexican-American War, the Civil War, economic ups and downs, the westward expansion of the United States, and others. Chapters eleven through fourteen are all devoted to these type of events, their effect on the Santa Fe trade, and vice versa.

One minor complaint I had about the book is Dary’s extreme specificity about the loads of goods carried, number of mules, men, oxen, and other figures he lists about the many known expeditions that were taken on the trail. These figures were useful, however, in seeing how the volume of trade along the trail ebbed and flowed with the economy and world events. Given the specificity about the expeditions to Santa Fe, I thought there was a glaring lack of information on the amount of goods taken back to and sold in Kansas and Missouri on the way back. Perhaps there is simply a lack of historical data on this aspect of the Santa Fe trade, but I do not remember seeing anything to that effect in the book.

Another flaw in The Santa Fe Trail: Its History, Legends and Lore is that Dary does not present much information from the perspective of the Native Americans. Again, this may be due to a lack of available historical information. I suspect there might be a little more available than presented in this book, possibly in the form of oral tradition. Similarly, Dary does not place much significance on the trading of Native Americans with Santa Fe. He devotes a good deal of chapter two to the trade from New Spain to New Mexico, but little to the trade that was going on with the Native Americans during the same period. On the upside, however, Dary does deal with the cruelty meted out to the Native Americans in retaliation for their raids on commerce along the Santa Fe Trail.

While I did not get the impression that Dary was trying to make a specific argument or point in this book, I found a couple of points he made, whether intentionally or not. One is the extreme to which American capitalists were willing to go to try and milk every ounce of profit out of the Santa Fe trade. A perfect example of this is in chapter 11 where Dary relays the tale of Francis X. Aubry. Aubry overused and killed many of his animals, lost several men, and almost killed himself in his successful attempt to make three trade expeditions from Missouri to Santa Fe in one year. While this is an extreme case, at least some degree of Aubry’s ambition can be seen in almost all the trading expeditions in the book. The traders literally faced death at every turn. Of course the reward for doing so was often big bucks.

Another point that I thought was clear in the book was that the Santa Fe Trail and trade was extremely important to the westward expansion of the United States. This point is made at several points in the book, but one in particular concerns the establishment of Fort Union located on the Santa Fe Trail, about one hundred miles northeast of Santa Fe. Dary wrote,


[Fort Union] became the principal supply and staging center for all military operations in the Southwest, and within a few years it became the hub of a great network of forts located in Texas, New Mexico, and parts of Arizona, Colorado, and Kansas. Fort Union’s lifeline was the Santa Fe Trail which linked the post to Fort Leavenworth" (p. 216.)


The Santa Fe Trail also helped the Union to defend its extreme western flank during the Civil War, and a portion of the trail served as a highway for prospectors going west in search of gold. Also related to this point is the interesting westward migration of the eastern end of the Santa Fe Trail that coincides with the western expansion of the settlers. Initially, the trail began in Franklin, Missouri and then sixty years later, just before the railroads made the trail virtually obsolete, the easternmost point was Las Animas, Colorado.

Overall, The Santa Fe Trail: Its History, Legends and Lore is a useful, interesting, and telling book. The complaints I had could have been addressed, but the addition of things I felt were left out might have pushed the book past Dary’s intended scope. This book presents a wealth of information in an easy to read, understandable, and entertaining fashion. I believe The Santa Fe Trail: Its History, Legends and Lore would be a very good read for a class studying the American Southwest, American westward expansion, or pioneer America if used in conjunction with other books or sources.